Hallöchen!

I followed
http://blog.pcode.nl/2010/06/28/darktable-camera-color-profiling/ to
get an input colour profile for the NEX-7.  I have already sent the
RAW and the reference file to the DT developers, so I think they
will convert it to an enhanced colour matrix when they have the
time.  However, this profiling was a daunting experience the
observations of which I'd like to share:

1. Calling colprof without the "-u" parameter means that the white
   patch (with L=90.45 in my case) is converted to L=1 after the
   colorin module.  This makes the image brighter.  However, the
   standard colour matrix doesn't do this.  Additionally, the base
   curve cannot be applied anymore because the image gets way too
   bright then.

2. Exporting with "colorimetric (absolute)" means that the white
   patch becomes yellowish.  All other colour intents work properly
   as far as I can see.  I have "always littlecms2" activated.  If I
   deactivate it, there is never a colour shift.

3. The quality of the ICC seems to be suprisingly poor.  If I apply
   the ICC to the original calibration image, I expect the values on
   the patches to correspond with the values in the reference file.
   For the patch "L19" (deep blue), the reference file says: (in
   Lab)

   12.62   39.19  -65.00

   In Darktable, I get (after exposuring to the white patch L=90.45
   and chcking white balance):

   18.6    19.3   -51.3  (matrix)
   17.5    18.4   -49.1  (shape+matrix)
   20.9    17.1   -51.2  (Lab cLUT)
   23.7    11.1   -47.2  (XYZ cLUT)

   If I use dcraw for applying the profile with "dcraw -4 -T -o
   profile.icc DSC00001.ARW" (measured in DT):

   15.3    28.9   -56.0  (for ALL profiles)

   Yes, I really double-checked that, the given profile file didn't
   matter.  WTF?  If I give "-o 0" I get much worse values, and
   without -o at all (i.e. standard Adobe colour matrix) I get

   15.2    28.6   -55.6  (Adobe colour matrix)

   I find all these figures disappointing.  And the LUTs performed
   worst.  And it is noteworthy that dcraw performes different from
   DT with the same profile files, and better.

So is it possible to get a reasonable (i.e. 5-10 times closer)
enhanced colour matrix somehow?  If so, how?

Tschö,
Torsten.

-- 
Torsten Bronger    Jabber ID: [email protected]
                                  or http://bronger-jmp.appspot.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users

Reply via email to