* johannes hanika <[email protected]> [07-23-13 10:04]: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Patrick Shanahan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > * johannes hanika <[email protected]> [07-23-13 04:13]: > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Patrick Shanahan <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > [...] > > > > It works for you with a *single* image displayed in lightroom? > > > > > > > > ie: with a single image displayed I select that image, <ctrl><a> to > > > > select all, and <ctrl><e> to export *all* images. But I only get one > > > > image exported. > > > > > > > > Is this the intended action? > > > > > > > > note: if more than *one* image is displayed in lightroom view, all > > > > *selected* images are exported. Doesn't seem correct to me and > > > > *wasn't how it worked 4 days ago. > > > > > > > > > > selection behaviour changed a little in that respect. it seemed > > > counter intuitive that actions would work on the whole set of > > > images, even though you're only looking at one (1 image/row zoom in > > > lt). especially so if you use ctrl-t to tag an image or when giving > > > color labels it's easy to forget that you have a big selection in > > > the background. > > > > > > i don't have a strong opinion about it, but i thought the arguments > > > above were kind of convincing. > > > > Then *why* allow an all the selection of more than one image with a > > single image in view? > > because you dont want to lose your selection just because you're taking > another close look. > > > > This seems *more* counter-intuitive than *not* performing an expected > > operation on all *selected* items, or is it limited only to exporting, > > which would be even more counter-intuitive? Isn't the selection > > process/action designed to limit actions to a *selection*? And in the > > same manner, I can limit view to four or ten images and having twenty > > selected, export all twenty instead of only those appearing in my > > view. Please consider returning to the previous behaviour. > > > > you'll have to fight that out with the proponents of the current behaviour, > i don't care either way.
Ok, *who* do I *fight* with in order to return to previous action? Or is it possible to have it both ways with a configurable option? > > ps: Expanding or contracting a group now is not a work-a-round to return > > from darkroom view to lightroom view and display the same image from > > darkroom view. > > > right. we should remove the grouping feature until that's fixed. Thanks, I look forward to that and will appreciate it. -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
