| I hope I am not missing the point? In LT, why not decrease the number
| of images on the light table by rotating the thumb wheel on the mouse
| until one image fills the whole central part of the screen? That is
| what I do to perform a quick screening of a collection of images. Then
| I use the arrow keys to move among the different images. It is
| certainly not pixel-for-pixel, but if one wants to look at the type
| of detail at a pixel-by-pixel basis, it is not a quick screening any
| more.

 As mentioned, one of the reasons to want this (or even a >100% view) is
to assess which version of a picture has the best focus or detail for a
particular spot. This is a quick check, as are a number of similar checks
for particular details.

 A related issue is that 'zoom to fit screen' is not necessarily very
large for a vertically oriented picture on typical displays.

        - cks

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your SQL database under version control now!
Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent 
caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under 
version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users

Reply via email to