* Federico Bruni <[email protected]> [08-05-13 16:15]:
 [...]
> sorry,  I still don't understand your point
> If I list one image in lighttable I can easily go back and forth between
> darkroom and lighttable. If you want to keep the full view without panes,
> you can use the d and l keyboard shortcuts.
> What I'm missing now? :-)

open darktable, starts in lighttable view.
change view to single image
select viewed image
change to darkroom
advance several images in darkroom
return to lighttable view

what image is presented, the image you had open in darkroom or the image
you previously saw in lightroom.
 
you are not "missing" anything, but in lighttable single image display,
darkroom always returns to lighttable displaying the last image displayed
in lighttable, not the image that was current in darkroom.  And returning
to darkroom displays the image that *was* displayed/current in lighttable.

I see this as a bug forcing me to view multiple images in lighttable which
hinders my workflow and I frequently work on groups of > 1000 images. 
Hunting for last image I was processing requires tagging the image before
changing views and maintaining groups of edited/non-edited images.  Plus
it makes it difficult to make a change to a previously edited image when
you find something on the current image that makes you rething previous
processing.  Time consuming where time is in short supply.

I prefer viewing, editing and tagging or deleting the present image, not
going thru thousands of images more than once.  Doesn't appear possible,
and above listed restrictions cripple me, in-spite of darkroom being the
best photography editing software I see available at *any* price.  I
previously used bibblepro/corel-after-SHOCK, and the output from darktable
wins hands down.

-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan       Plainfield, Indiana, USA      HOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.org        Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
http://en.opensuse.org                           openSUSE Community Member
Registered Linux User #207535                    @ http://linuxcounter.net

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your SQL database under version control now!
Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent 
caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under 
version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users

Reply via email to