Hi Pascal, On 11/30/2013 11:38 AM, Pascal Obry wrote: > To me all three points above are because you are trying to use dt in a > way it was not design to be. dt is a all-in-one tool that also manage > your collections so you never want to do anything with the images > behind the scene. The moving can be done in dt. Then having the xmp > next to the image or in a sub-directory is not an issue since you just > don't see them. And doing the move in dt also move the .xmp, again no > issue in this case.
I know this is the case and that's why I'm asking if you plan to change this. I don't like softwares that want to store their data in their own database. I love the simple file-system stuff. It is more reliable or at least this is the perception I have. > To me dt and lightroom (I've been using lightroom extensively) are on > par here. No they are not. In LR you get a history entry for every change you make on your image. If you do change the same parameter twice you'll get two entries. In DT you get an entry for a plugin instance or something like that. I'm not really sure how it works, yet, but I'm sure it is not that powerful and of course it is not obvious at all how it works. BTW: I've used LR once or twice, but this feature is really great. Best regards, Teodor ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
