On 08/07/2014 06:16 AM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 6. August 2014, 10:06:38 schrieb Elle Stone: >> This pdf: >> http://darktable.org/redmine/attachments/download/764/color_flowchart.pdf >> seems to indicate that Darktable processing always go through LAB, even >> when absolutely no post-interpolation processing is requested. Is this >> really the case? Is the image -always- converted to LAB before being >> converted to the output ICC profile and saved to disk? > > Yes, currently images ALWAYS go through Lab. We intend to change that though > when we redesign how the internal pipe works. First steps have been taken, but > this is probably going to take a while.
Thanks much for the information. A related question: When images are pushed through LAB, will the redesigned pipe (or even does the current pipe) allow for colors (saturated greens, yellows, blues) that exceed the usual LAB integer encoding as described by Lindbloom (http://brucelindbloom.com/index.html?LabGamutDisplayHelp.html)? To be more clear, this isn't a question about integer vs floating point encoding, but rather about the gamut covered by the encoding. Elle ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Infragistics Professional Build stunning WinForms apps today! Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
