Hi Dan:

Here is another test shot (.NEF, Nikon D800):

RAW (.NEF): https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2171814/_F1C6327.NEF

XMP: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2171814/_F1C6327.NEF.xmp

Best, Francisco

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Dan Torop <d...@pnym.net> wrote:

>  Hi Francisco
>
> I think the darks have to be very dark in the image to see artifacts -- if
> they even happen. When you choose the eyedropper from tone curve and click
> in the image, the L levels in the darkest (and artifact-ed) bits of the
> X-Trans image have L values of 1 or 2 (and are changed to about 11 or 12 by
> the curve). In the Nikon image they're not that dark (generally about 15, a
> few are as dark as 5, which gets scaled up to approx. 12), so there's not
> as disproportionate an amplification of the chroma. It would be interesting
> to see an image with bright reds in deep shadow.
>
> I'm talking through my hat here, but it's also possible that the input
> profile for the Nikon image does a better job keeping the chroma values in
> check? Or there could just be a difference in how the sensors record darker
> colors?
>
> Best,
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015, at 09:56 AM, Francisco Cribari wrote:
>
> Hi Dan:
>
> Here is a photo I've just made (for testing purposes) of my wife wearing a
> red shirt (.NEF, Nikon D800).
>
> RAW (.NEF) file: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2171814/_F1C6322.NEF
>
> XMP file: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2171814/_F1C6322.NEF.xmp
>
> Best, Francisco
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Dan Torop <d...@pnym.net> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Francisco,
>
> Do you have an example NEF file? One with shadows with saturated colors
> would make this most visible. The Nikon sensor could also be less noisy in
> the shadows.
>
> I'm not sure if these artifacts are just a cost of automatic chroma
> scaling, or should be considered a bug for a corner case.
>
> Best,
> Dan
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015, at 06:03 AM, Francisco Cribari wrote:
>
> Hi Dan:
>
> Thank you for your message. I have been noticing color artifacts when
> raising the lower point of the tone curve when editing X-Trans RAW images
> but not when editing standard Bayer RAW images (e.g., Nikon D800 .NEF). Is
> there anything specific to X-Trans RAW images here?
>
> Thanks again. Best, Francisco
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Dan Torop <d...@pnym.net> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Francisco,
>
> This is interesting... The trouble seems to come via the tone curve
> module's automatic scale chroma setting. (The noise doesn't seem to depend
> upon the demosaicing algorithm -- it's there with VNG or Markesteijn.)
>
> When "scale chroma" is set, each pixel processed has its saturation ("a"
> and "b") adjusted proportionally to how its luminance ("L") is changed.
> That is, if the luminance for that pixel is increased by 5%, its saturation
> is increased by 5%. For the tone curve you drew, which pushes up the black
> point, this breaks down. The very dim pixels in this curve have their
> luminance increased by approx. 10x, and hence "scale chroma" then
> correspondingly saturates them by about 10x. As the shirt is so red, this
> makes the saturation for the shirt especially garish in its darker areas
> (indeed, the "a" value becomes greater than 100). Furthermore, the
> saturation changes are jumpy because slight luminance changes in the
> shadows produce radically amplified saturation changes -- and this makes
> visible the noise inherent to the shadows. All this adds up to the horrible
> artifacts which you are seeing.
>
> There probably would be a way to rewrite the tone curve's "scale chroma"
> to handle this case, but it wouldn't be backwards compatible, so doubtful
> dt devs would go for it? (There already seems to be some code there to
> better handle very low luminance values.)
>
> What if instead you use "scale chroma" set to "manual"? There's no
> artifacts then, and the results appear pleasing. Alternately, in the
> tutorial you link to, it looks as though the tone curve change is happening
> in RGB colorspace, not Lab. You could simulate this in dt via enabling the
> color balance module and increasing the "factor" for its"lift" parameter.
> Or even by lowering the "black" in the exposure module?
>
> Best,
> Dan
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015, at 06:22 PM, Francisco Cribari wrote:
>
> My second camera is a Fuji X100S, which has an X-Trans sensor. I am
> getting color artifacts in several images when I raise the lower end of the
> tone curve. The problem does NOT happen with my Nikon D800 RAW images, only
> with X-Trans RAW images. I would also like to point out that it is common
> to raise the lower end of tone curve and to lower its upper end. This is
> done to give the image a "vintage/classic" look. See, e.g.,
>
> https://photographylife.com/that-classic-vintage-look
>
> For some reason, that tends to cause color artifacts in X-Trans RAW images
> processed using Darktable.
>
> Here is an example:
>
> RAW (.RAF) file: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2171814/_FFX7093.RAF
>
> XMP file: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2171814/_FFX7093_01.RAF.xmp
>
> Zoom in the image and take a look at the man's shirt (near his right arm).
> (I have already reported another case in this mailing mailing list.)
>
> I run DT version 1.6.1+30~g6b508d0 on an Ubuntu notebook. Any suggestions?
> Thank you. Francisco
>
> --
> Francisco Cribari - http://about.me/cribariFrancisco CribaraaahhhFrancisco
> Cribari - http://about.me/crihhhrancisco Cribari -
> http://about.me/cribariffaaaaFrancisco Cribari - http://www.cribari.com.br
> - "All theory, my friend, is grey, but green is life's glad golden tree."
> --Goethe (Faust)
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
> sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is
> your
> hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
> look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
> *_______________________________________________*
> Darktable-users mailing list
> Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Francisco Cribari - http://about.me/cribariFrancisco CribaraaahhhFrancisco
> Cribari - http://about.me/crihhhrancisco Cribari -
> http://about.me/cribariffaaaaFrancisco Cribari - http://www.cribari.com.br
> - "All theory, my friend, is grey, but green is life's glad golden tree."
> --Goethe (Faust)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Francisco Cribari - http://about.me/cribariFrancisco CribaraaahhhFrancisco
> Cribari - http://about.me/crihhhrancisco Cribari -
> http://about.me/cribariffaaaaFrancisco Cribari - http://www.cribari.com.br
> - "All theory, my friend, is grey, but green is life's glad golden tree."
> --Goethe (Faust)
>
>
>



-- 
Francisco Cribari - http://about.me/cribariFrancisco CribaraaahhhFrancisco
Cribari - http://about.me/crihhhrancisco Cribari -
http://about.me/cribariffaaaaFrancisco Cribari - http://www.cribari.com.br
- "All theory, my friend, is grey, but green is life's glad golden tree."
--Goethe (Faust)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users

Reply via email to