Le > > Not ideal using a number of JPGs, but I've not noticed a terrible > quality loss. I also used JPGs because by the time I finished > processing everything, I had over 16GB of JPGs and CR2 raw files. > > At least, that's my workflow. > > yes, it saves space, thought if you wan't to post-process the result in DT or gimp, you will have litle things available.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud. GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business. Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today. https://www.gigenetcloud.com/ _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users