Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015, 18:12:40 schrieb Jan Kundrát:
> On Tuesday, 18 August 2015 17:49:15 CEST, jeremy rosen wrote:

[...]

> is safely stored in git. That's a huge bonus for me because I occasionaly
> touch this computer when I'm not 100% sober. I can rely on git's history

:)

[...]

> This is a *huge* task, and because it has a lot to do with data integrity,
> it must better be done by something which is battle-tested and which has a
> good track record of reliability. With all due respect to the wide
> Darktable community, I do not think that we should be in the business of
> providing storage management software because long-term data storage is
> orthogonal to RAW development and photo management, in my opinion.

Word.

> That's why DT's local-copy is not enough for me. However, I would love to
> extend this local-copy thing to call out to git-annex' commands which make
> files available/unavailable locally. That should of course be an optional
> feature.

At least with the development version Lua support should be at a stage where 
all of that can be done. Possibly by a script that is generic enough to be put 
into our Lua git repo so everyone can benefit.

> TL;DR: git-annex is a superset of DT's local-copy. They should be made to
> play well with each other, IMHO.
> 
> Cheers,
> Jan

Tobias

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users

Reply via email to