On Saturday, 22 August 2015 17:05:52 CEST, Derek Kite wrote:
> Zoom out so you can see the thumbnails of all the images. It starts with a
> blank box and then creates a thumbnail. Once they are all done it speeds up
> considerably.

Thanks, but my e-mail is about showing one big image, not about showing a 
list of thumbnails. I'm afraid that anything smaller than a full-screen 
view doesn't allow me to evaluate these images and to assign a proper 
score/rating to them.

> Also go into settings. You can set how many and how much memory for
> thumbnails.

I'm not seeing a problem with thumbnails getting purged form the cache. I'm 
seeing a problem with no preload of a big-size preview, a 
one-image-at-a-time thing.

> There are third party raw viewers that are very quick. Qeegie is one, but
> they won't show the edited raw.

A third-party tool won't manipulate Darktable's rating of an image. I'm 
looking for a workflow advice which integrates with Darktable, not for a 
replacement tool.

> Make sure your machine is serious. I've got an eight core amd with 32 gb,
> it is reasonably fast. I'm considering an ssd drive as a working storage, I
> tried the amd video card processor but ran into instability.

I would prefer not to buy new hardware here; this laptop is pretty powerful 
(Thinkpad T420s, i5-2520M, 16GB RAM,...).

In the way I work, an up-front delay doesn't matter that much. It's the 
iterative price which I pay during each move between two images which slows 
me down. This is why I believe that a better preload is a better solution 
than throwing more HW at the problem  for accommodating these peak loads.

Cheers,
Jan

-- 
Trojitá, a fast Qt IMAP e-mail client -- http://trojita.flaska.net/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users

Reply via email to