Am Montag, den 23.11.2015, 17:02 -0300 schrieb Francisco Cribari: [...] > I have just exported the same photo without and with the correction. > Could you please take a look at them and let me know how they look on > your monitor? > > > no correction: > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2171814/photo-not-corrected.jpg > > > correction: > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2171814/photo-corrected.jpg > > > It would be useful if other people could do the same and let me know > how they see the two photos on their monitors.
On my system (BenQ 2765, calibrated with ArgyllCMS and ColorMunki, 100% sRGB), the corrected version definitely looks cooler. In the Geeqie histogramm the corrected one shows a blue shoulder at higher intensities, whereas the uncorrected shows only one luminosity histogramm. So I think the uncorrected is the correct one ;-) What light are you using to assess the colour tint of your prints? The usual lighting is usually too warm (2700 - 3500 K), the CIE Standard Illuminant (called D65) used for colour measurements has 6500 K (representing midday daylight). Accordingly a reference plate for pure white does not really look like "pure white", but more like off-white. Regards, Oliver ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Go from Idea to Many App Stores Faster with Intel(R) XDK Give your users amazing mobile app experiences with Intel(R) XDK. Use one codebase in this all-in-one HTML5 development environment. Design, debug & build mobile apps & 2D/3D high-impact games for multiple OSs. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=254741551&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
