Wasn't sure if DT may still have dependencies on system libraries that it doesn't package. I didn't have any specific ones in mind, just grabbing at straws since relatively few people seem to be impacted by this. -Scott
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Patrick Shanahan <p...@wahoo.no-ip.org> wrote: > * Scott <spectre...@gmail.com> [01-20-16 23:36]: >> Could it be that I'm running Ubuntu 14.04 and DT is using an older >> library? Is everyone else that uses Ubuntu running a more recent >> version? >> -Scott >> >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Scott <spectre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > With DT full screen, If I set the lighttable zoom to show 5 images >> > across, it is rather slow (as previously mentioned). If I leave it at >> > that zoom level but re-size the darktable window within the window >> > manager (so the images are smaller, but still 5 images across and same >> > number of images shown in DT as before), the performance greatly >> > improves. I assume this is due to the same reason that the >> > performance improves in full screen by zooming out. >> > >> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Scott <spectre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I ran 'darktable -d perf -d lighttable' to get the lighttable output >> >> and sent it to a text file, opened up darktable and moved the cursor >> >> around a bit, parsed the file to grab the lines with the total time, >> >> '[lighttable] expose took #.#### sec', and output the maximum and mean >> >> times listed. Here are some results. >> >> >> >> 1. 54 pictures, all default settings -> max 0.14, average 0.07 >> >> 2. Same library, turn off color managed thumbnails -> max 0.12, average >> >> 0.033 >> >> 3. Same library, turn on color managed thumbnails, run >> >> 'darktable-generate-cache -m 7' -> max 0.15, average 0.09 >> >> 4. Reset darktable (remove ~/.cache/darktable and >> >> ~/.config/darktable), import just 5 pictures, then run the same test >> >> -> max 0.04, average 0.01 >> >> >> >> It feels like the timing with the first tests is greater than 0.14 >> >> seconds, but my feeling is probably wrong. Regardless, it is *very* >> >> noticeable and the test does support my observations that turning off >> >> color managed thumbnails improves the response a little bit, but not >> >> drastically and that the response time is great with just 5 pictures >> >> instead of ~50 pictures. >> >> >> >> I also tried playing with the option 'memory in megabytes to use for >> >> the thumbnail cache' and the two memories related to tiling, but >> >> neither seemed to have any noticeable effect. >> >> >> >> Are there any other tests I can do to help debug this? Darktable is >> >> great, but it is rather frustrating to use like this. >> >> >> >> -Scott >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:32 PM, johannes hanika <hana...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >>> heya, >> >>> >> >>> sounds worrying, i'd like to get to the bottom of this. >> >>> >> >>> i guess the long term best solution would be to instruct cairo to only >> >>> expose whatever thumbnails are changed when moving around with the >> >>> mouse (but i tried quickly, it's not trivial to do and still work with >> >>> all features). >> >>> >> >>> darktable -d perf -d lighttable >> >>> >> >>> is what you want to use to get timings for lighttable btw. >> >>> >> >>> -jo >> >>> >> >>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Scott <spectre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> Hello all, >> >>>> >> >>>> I'm having an issue since upgrading to Darktable 2.0 (Pascal's PPA). >> >>>> When in lighttable, if I just move my cursor around it takes ~1/3 >> >>>> second before the thumbnail under the cursor is highlighted and the >> >>>> "image information" updates to it. Searching the bug tracker and >> >>>> archives show that I'm not the only one with this issue, but I haven't >> >>>> seen any fixes for it. A couple references: >> >>>> http://redmine.darktable.org/issues/10764 >> >>>> http://sourceforge.net/p/darktable/mailman/message/34654461/ >> >>>> >> >>>> I have: >> >>>> - Ubuntu 14.04 LTS >> >>>> - 16 GB of RAM >> >>>> - GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST (proprietary drivers, ) >> >>>> - Intel Core i5-3570K (4 cores @ 3.40Ghz) >> >>>> - All photos in my library are Canon CR2 >> >>>> - 27" monitor (Dell U2713HM) is calibrated using dipcalGUI and set to >> >>>> 2560x1440 resolution >> >>>> >> >>>> The first few things I've tried: >> >>>> - Running darktable-generate-cache >> >>>> - Running with '-d perf' (but it doesn't print anything when I simply >> >>>> move the mouse around the screen) >> >>>> - Changing the number of background threads >> >>>> - Running with and without OpenCL >> >>>> - Turning off color managed cache (this gave a slight improvement, but >> >>>> still much slower than DT 1.6.9) >> >>>> >> >>>> I then deleted ~/.cache/darktable and ~/.config/darktable, and >> >>>> imported only 5 pictures and the response time seemed very quick. I >> >>>> then added a folder (50 images) and the response time lagged again. I >> >>>> also noticed that it seems to depend on how zoomed in the images are >> >>>> in lighttable. If I zoom out so the thumbnails are very small, then >> >>>> the response time is good. As I zoom the thumbnails larger, this >> >>>> response time gets worse and worse. 5 images across the screen seems >> >>>> to be the worst, and then as I zoom in even closer it gets slightly >> >>>> better. >> >>>> >> >>>> I then imported some more pictures so that I have nearly 200 in the >> >>>> database/cache. Now even when lighttable is zoomed as as far as >> >>>> possible, the response time is very slow. >> >>>> >> >>>> Possible output request: >> >>>> $ ldd `which darktable` | grep gomp >> >>>> libgomp.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgomp.so.1 >> >>>> (0x00007fa6da138000) >> >>>> >> >>>> Does anyone have any other recommendations to try? >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks, >> >>>> Scott >> >>>> >> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>>> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance >> >>>> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month >> >>>> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now >> >>>> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! >> >>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> Darktable-users mailing list >> >>>> Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance >> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month >> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now >> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 >> _______________________________________________ >> Darktable-users mailing list >> Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users > > > If you installed a pre-packaged version 2.0 of darktable, why would you > thing you were using an "older library"? And which library are you > referring? > > -- > (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri > http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri > http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 > Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 > _______________________________________________ > Darktable-users mailing list > Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
