Hallöchen!

Roman Lebedev writes:

> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Torsten Bronger
> <bron...@physik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
>> (and planned for Lensfun, so it may find its way into DT possibly
>> in the future).  However, "ordinary" raw files are used instead
>> of NDF files.
>
> Sounds cool :)
>
> However, there is a small problem...
> By design, our modules should(must?) not depend on any other files/images
> (except watermarks and color profiles).
> So this way you can copy IMG.CR2 and IMG.CR2.xmp (and
> ~/.config/darktable/{watermarks,colorin})
> and have all the stuff necessary to produce exactly the same export of
> that image on another machine.
> (obviously, lensfun lens corrections are also an exception
> here...)

As you say, the lens correction are already an exception.  The
current design for flat fields is that they are stored in
.local/share/lensfun/flatfields.  Unfortunately, flat fields cannot
be compressed significantly.  Still, you think a copy should be in
the XMP?

Tschö,
Torsten.

-- 
Torsten Bronger    Jabber ID: torsten.bron...@jabber.rwth-aachen.de


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users

Reply via email to