I recall that this was done on purpose. The nature of legal questions is that they oftentimes contain sensitive information.
Let's move this discussion to the Bug [1]. Janet is copied on the bug and should be able to clarify. Wayne [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=166285 On 04/25/2012 04:00 PM, Miles Parker wrote: > I'm guessing it's just an accident of how the IP system was setup, e.g. no > set of permissions set up for IP questions vs. actual CQs. > > On 2012-04-25, at 12:58 PM, Aaron Digulla wrote: > >> Am 25.04.2012 21:45, schrieb Denis Roy: >> >>> Sure, for CQs, but this is discussion involving licensing and copyright >>> initiated by a member of our community (and a committer, no less). I >>> don't understand why such discussion would need to happen behind closed >>> doors, especially considering we advocate openness and transparency. >> +1 >> >> I could understand if comments were disabled for CQs to keep them clean >> but why completely hide them? Is that a legal matter (NDA or something) >> or a social matter (avoid bad blood, heated discussions, trolling)? >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Aaron "Optimizer" Digulla a.k.a. Philmann Dark >> "It's not the universe that's limited, it's our imagination. >> Follow me and I'll show you something beyond the limits." >> http://blog.pdark.de/ >> _______________________________________________ >> dash-dev mailing list >> dash-dev@eclipse.org >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dash-dev > _______________________________________________ > dash-dev mailing list > dash-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dash-dev > -- Wayne Beaton The Eclipse Foundation Twitter: @waynebeaton Explore Eclipse Projects <http://www.eclipse.org/projects>
_______________________________________________ dash-dev mailing list dash-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dash-dev
