On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 06:26:11PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> I'm not sure that that makes sense, however.  Unless you're hauling a 
> *lot* of off_t's around the code, the incremental complexity is hardly 
> worth it.

Either way it's pretty insignificant.  Yes the decrease in code
size isn't great but then the increase in complexity isn't large
either.  FWIW the decreases all come from stat on directories
and scripts.

> FWIW, klibc doesn't even implement the LFS64 APIs, nor does it implement 
> the legacy 32-bit off_t mode in any way.

That's already handled by autoconf.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dash" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to