Edward Lam <edw...@sidefx.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Oct 1, 2014, at 8:41 PM, Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>> 
>> Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I'm not interested in burdening the cygwin build of dash with a one-off
>>> patch, so I'd like to gauge the upstream thoughts - is it worth
>>> including platform-specific patches like this (no penalty to build size
>>> of non-cygwin platforms, and on cygwin, it allows 'cd c:/' to behave as
>>> shorthand for 'cd /cygdrive/c/')?  If the patch lands in dash.git, then
>>> I'll rebuild the cygwin port of dash to include a backport (rather than
>>> waiting for 0.5.9 to be released).  If there is no interest, I'd rather
>>> just drop the patch.  The cygwin community already states that
>>> /cygdrive/c notation is the official way to access drive letters, and
>>> that if 'c:/' works it is nice, but it is not a design goal to always
>>> have it work.
>> 
>> It's fine by me.
>> 
> 
> Is that a yes to allow platform-specific patches into dash?

If there is zero impact on other platforms and it doesn't adversely
impact the maintainability then yes.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dash" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to