On 9/2/16 10:46 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 09:25:15AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
>>
>> 2.13.1 Patterns Matching a Single Character
>>
>> [
>> If an open bracket introduces a bracket expression as in XBD RE
>> Bracket Expression, except that the <exclamation-mark> character ( '!' )
>> shall replace the <circumflex> character ( '^' ) in its role in a
>> non-matching list in the regular expression notation, it shall introduce
>> a pattern bracket expression. A bracket expression starting with an
>> unquoted <circumflex> character produces unspecified results. Otherwise,
>> '[' shall match the character itself.
>
> BTW, this last sentence is not present in
>
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009604499/utilities/xcu_chap02.html#tag_02_13
That's pretty old; it's from 2004.
> So I presume it's a newer unreleased revision.
It's in the current revision, which dates from 2008.
>
> Seriously, you guys are turning POSIX into a joke by introducing
> all these new requirements. At this point I think we should
> pretty much give up on POSIX compliance the way it's headed.
Let's not go overboard here. This was introduced to tighten up ambiguous
behavior: what happens when the open bracket *doesn't* introduce a
bracket expression.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU [email protected] http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dash" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
