On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:30:02AM +0200, Petr Skočík wrote: > Hi, > > would you be willing to pull something like this? > > static int > @@ -488,7 +490,9 @@ olderf (const char *f1, const char *f2) > > return (stat (f1, &b1) == 0 && > stat (f2, &b2) == 0 && > - b1.st_mtime < b2.st_mtime); > + (b1.st_mtim.tv_sec < b2.st_mtim.tv_sec || > + (b1.st_mtim.tv_sec == b2.st_mtim.tv_sec && (b1.st_mtim.tv_nsec > < > b2.st_mtim.tv_nsec ))) > + ); > } > > static int > > I could use greater resolution in `test -nt` / `test -ot`, and st_mtim > field is standardized under POSIX.1-2008 (or so stat(2) says).
Sure. But your patch is corrupted. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dash" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
