Robert Love wrote: > Nice! > > I'd put the perror() first. I think it reads better in the EFAULT case > but, more importantly, you could be reading errno from fprintf() if you > call it after.
Hmm, I went for the way I did because perror seems to modify it! (it reads 28 == ENOSPC before perror, and 29 after...?!?). Anyway, your point is valid, so I guess we'll just take a copy of errno before messing around with error messages. Thanks, Daniel _______________________________________________ Dashboard-hackers mailing list Dashboard-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dashboard-hackers
