On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 12:01 -0400, Joe Shaw wrote: > It's possibly a bug, but it could also just be a difference in the way > beagle-search presents its information. (It's not by URI type or data > source.) > > Which results to you feel are more "correct"? Among those two sets of > results, what are the differences?
I don't know for that query which is the more correct, which in itself is a problem. Is there a way I can open each of the URIs returned by beagle-query? > Just eyeballing your beagle-query results here, you say you see only two > conversations in beagle-search. Based on the beagle-query output, you > have two emails there (conversations) and four mail attachments. Oh, does the #n mean an attachment, then? I didn't realise that. > Those > attachments I believe show up as documents in beagle-search. My guess > is that those four plus the number in your beagle-query output equals > 18. Let me have a look at that... Yes, some of the documents in beagle-search are mail attachments, but only *3* of them are labelled as such. This query was just an example, though - the anomaly I originally posted is still present: a search for "lumberjack" gives no results in beagle-search and two in beagle-query: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rbos]$ beagle-query lumberjack email://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Personal Folders/Azul/UK;uid=1337#0 email://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Sent;uid=2640#0 Furthermore, those shouldn't be given as attachments, as there isn't one, but they're in the HTML part of the mail that Evolution saves - ie it doesn't store locally a plain text version. So is the problem here that beagle thinks it's an attachment but beagle-search can't find one? I can forward you the email source to look at, if it helps. Paddy _______________________________________________ Dashboard-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dashboard-hackers
