I'll maintain it. We talked about this once on irc with Joe, and the idea would be to support http transactions directly in libbeagle (using probably libneon). So in the end it's more about keeping libbeagle in sync with the daemon's features than anything else. I developped the app on top of the beagle-http soc tarball, and used it successively without any change with the 0.2.8 and 0.2.10 releases.
Cheers, Thomas Kevin Kubasik wrote : > Wow, I gotta say, thats pretty cool. Once the SoC merges take place I > think we could look at serious maintenance of this project. My question > is, will you be able to keep this code in sync with the main beagle > tree? I really doubt any of the existing hackers are willing to take it > on, if its something that you can keep updated, than once we get SoC > merged, well look a little more into compatibility and integration > between something like this an a main release. But that's just my $0.02, > Joe has a little more final/official say on this. (Also, I still need to > take a look at the actual code itself ;) ) > > > Cheers, > Kevin Kubasik > > On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 16:48 +0200, Thomas Charbonnel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've developped a native win32 beagle client working over tcp. > > It is designed to work with a patched beagle daemon to enable searching > > samba shares from windows machines (from win9x to XP). > > > > Once the Network beagle google soc code will be merged, I'll port the > > client to it so that no patching of the daemon will be required anymore. > > > > Further informations and download: > > http://www.undata.org/~thomas/beagle/ > > > > Thomas > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Dashboard-hackers mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dashboard-hackers _______________________________________________ Dashboard-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dashboard-hackers
