Hi, On Feb 10, 2008 10:49 AM, Debajyoti Bera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That sounds overwhelming ! There are only a few that are within our reach ... > yelp, nautilus (and possibly brassero) in gnome cvs and kerry in kde svn. > There are more to which we dont have direct access.
Sure, but we could provide patches. In general it's probably a pretty good exercise anyway to find out who the consumers of our APIs are so that we can find out how good they are, where they could use improvement, etc. > Isnt there a standard way of making string changes in a way to automatically > make applications aware of it ? Can these changes qualify as breaking binary > incompatibility; then we can increase library versions for both libbeagle1 > and beagle-0.0. We could do this, yeah. We could bump the API versions of the C# assemblies and the so number of the libbeagle shared libraries. This is probably a good idea. And not to sound like a broken record, but this stuff should probably go on a branch (or create a 0.3.x branch and continue on trunk) so that we don't find ourselves in another rut. Joe _______________________________________________ Dashboard-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dashboard-hackers
