Amen brother! Personally, I'm also against >= in gem dependencies. The sound great in practice, but in the real world you end up running into gem dependency nightmares. Then you end up with the dreaded 'Can't activate <gem> x.x.x, already activated gem <y.y.y>' error, that you spend the entire day tracking. That's just my opinion though.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mark Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mackframework.com http://api.mackframework.com/ http://github.com/markbates/mack On Aug 26, 2008, at 10:00 AM, Adam French wrote: > this tight coupling of merb and datamapper regarding extlib is > REALLY annoying. > > 2008/8/26 dc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> cross-posting from merb list. current merb doesnt work with DM 095, i >> was wondering if a fix is forthcoming? >> >> --------------------- >> Yehuda さんが書きました： >> >> Here's the deal: >> Various DM gems require extlib "= 0.9.5" -- this conflicts with the >> new >> version of extlib released with Merb (0.9.6). We need DataMapper to >> release >> another gem ASAP with ">= 0.9.5", possibly with a "< 1.0". >> Consider these the growing pains of actually sharing code across >> libraries. >> I am absolutely certain it's the right choice. >> -- Yehuda >> - 引用テキストを表示 - >> >> >> >>> >> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataMapper" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
