> Afaik we don't use the the asynchronious stuff in Postgres, so we're  
> not ruby thread friendly. Afaik the standard pg gem also doesn't use  
> it, so i wonder whether they are ruby thread friendly too. Any  
> information on that?

The standard pg gem does support the PG async interface. And it
implements
an async_exec() (or was that exec_async() ?) method which uses the
async interface
in a Ruby thread friendly way. The standard pg driver is a very good
wrapper for the
pg client APIs. I am still wondering why DO needs to rewrite every
driver from scratch?
If they see shortcomings in the current ones, why don't they just
contribute their fixes
so every one benefits?


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"DataMapper" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to