On Nov 7, 2:57 pm, "Dirkjan Bussink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, if that is the use case, I'd recommend against using sqlite in > the first place. For me it's strong point is having a simple no hassle > database system, usable within an application, but not something you > should use as a central datastore for multiple applications, services, > etc.
Yes, me neither, but in this case it's only one (multithreaded) application that reads and writes the database very rarely, but sometimes it happens that up to 30 thread start to write concurrently. The other argument against a full fledged rdms is, that this application runs on all our servers, cannot use a central database and needs to have a low memory footprint and low administrative overhead. I think I'll go with a mutex in execute_reader and execute_non_query and see if this solves the problem for me (as performance is not an issue in this case). Thank for your help! Philipp Schmid --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataMapper" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
