Bernerd, > But going forward -- as we work on the dm-core rewrite -- I would like > to see DO get upgraded with a JDBC interface, and not the other way > around. This will also give us the opportunity to build in some > missing features to DO: prepared statements, blob/clob support, etc. > > DO is a great interface, but I can't think of anything we would lose > by using the JDBC interface for DO, and it would let us use the JDBC > -without- a wrapper, which to me is -far- better than the alternative.
If you're thinking about migrating the DO drivers to emulate the JDBC interface what do you think about using FFI to connect the Ruby code to the pure C DO drivers? Not having done any testing, I was just curious what you and others thought about this. Dan (dkubb) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataMapper" group. To post to this group, send email to datamapper@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
