Michael Klishin wrote: > On 14.01.2009, at 13:54, heda wrote: > >> i've already got a project where I could use atleast two blocks of >> default options in more than one model. it would certainly make them >> arrid extra-DRY! > > > Alright I am convinced about block form. Next question is, I am going > to add it > to dkubb/dm-core, is it fine with you, or you want a backport to sam/ > dm-core? > > Dan's tree may or may not have a work-in-progress refactorings and > maybe it'd be > better to go with a stable/old tree if you don't want to be an "Early > Adopter" movie start ;) > > MK > > > > > >
So what would the usage look like in the block form? Earle --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataMapper" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
