codaniel, > I found the source of 'the problem' unless Im misusing them . . . it > seems that when you have a many to many relationship through an > anonymous resource model.many_to_one_relationships doesn't return the > relationship to that anonymous resource (by design?), but this is how > dm-constraints adds constraints... > > I wanted to take a crack at fixing it, but i wasn't sure if it was a > bug in dm-core, or if dm-constraints should do a pass through > many_to_many_relationships and see if it is through an anonymous > resource. Thoughts?
You might want to check out many to many associations in the "next" branch. I began to implement things differently than it was done in the master branch. I'd say I'm still only about 40-50% of the way done, but the basic ideas are there. You should be able to access the anonymous resource using the relationship objects. -- Dan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataMapper" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
