On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:41 PM, MarkMT <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm just wondering if there is any simple way to get around this. At > the moment I'm using strings in my Enum definition, which is fine, but > as I say, I can see the appeal of using symbols and short of using a > case statement to convert string parameters to symbols, wonder if > there is a way to do this. And if not, I wonder whether there is > really any context in which it does make sense to use symbolic Enums. We could have Enum use typecasting, but in this case it is likely to become typecasting to strings, because you possibly can get a value from a form that Ruby won't let you to turn into symbol. Would it make life easier? -- MK --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataMapper" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
