This actually made me realize that at the moment I haven't got any problem
at all. I have nothing in my way to stop me working as I want... I should
just use it and see how it goes.

Anyway, sorry for maybe bothering you guys, I'll give a shot at implementing
the unit of work and tell you how it goes.


Tks for your time!
Regards,
--
Fábio Rehm


On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Michael Klishin <[email protected]
> wrote:

>
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Fabio R. <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I don't know if you guys like this approach but I think it really make
> you
> > focus on your domain and its tests while you are working on it. Since DM
> > doesn't need the table to build model's properties it means that you
> don't
> > need to run migrations every time you make a change to your models.
> > That's an idea that I got from "Jimmy Nilsson - Applying Domain-Driven
> > Design and Patterns" book
>
> I think that a few examples would help understanding, and also
> examples of what DM currently
> cannot do to help you with your approach, but you would like it to do.
>
> Without specific examples I cannot judge any of your points: DM
> community is in general less opinionated,
> doesn't mind implementing "features that do not matter" from .NET and
> Java worlds, but still likes specific examples
> of how a new feature would make life simpler.
>
> usually a conversation about changes in DM hackers IRC channel starts like
> so:
> "hey, I was trying to implement adapter/plugin for X and found out
> that DM currently sucks because of so and so,
> and here is all the horrible decisions I had to make because of
> this.... (gist link comes here)"
> --
> MK
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"DataMapper" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to