Just FYI, in Rails3 #on was replaced with #[]. The final 0.10 should
probably support both.
-- Yehuda

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Hola <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Any idea why it doesn't mirror the AR interface? Is it likely to in
> the future?
>
> On Jun 20, 5:38 pm, Ted Han <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It shouldn't break anything in DM.
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Hola <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I believe that for #errors to pass muster in active_record_helper,
> > > there needs to be three methods in
> > > Datamapper::Validate::ValidationErrors: 'on', 'full_messages' and
> > > 'count'. Of these three methods, the only one that is missing is
> > > 'count'.
> >
> > >http://github.com/datamapper/dm-more/blob/459fd82a8923d7bf9c3d6ce64ab.
> ..
> >
> > > In AR 'count' is an alias for 'size', which is a simple one-liner:
> >
> > >http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Errors.html#M002504
> > > # File vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/validations.rb,
> > > line 225
> > > 225:     def size
> > > 226:       @errors.values.inject(0) { |error_count, attribute|
> > > error_count + attribute.size }
> > > 227:     end
> >
> > > I'm not sure if there was a particular reason why 'count' was omitted
> > > from the DM implementation - Is it safe for me to add my own 'count'
> > > method along the lines of the 'size' method in AR or would this break
> > > something in DM?
> >
> > > On Jun 20, 2:56 pm, Yehuda Katz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Is #errors in 0.10 a simple Hash? It would need to duck-type like an
> AR
> > > > errors object to work.
> > > > -- Yehuda
> >
> > > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Hola <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > In Rails, you add error messages to the view like so:
> >
> > > > > <% remote_form_for(mymodel) do |f| %>
> > > > >   <%= f.error_messages %>
> >
> > > > > However, if mymodel is a Datamapper rather than an ActiveRecord
> model,
> > > > > it produces an error:
> >
> > > > > undefined method `count' for {}:Hash
> >
> > > > > At the moment I am addressing this unfortunately by removing the
> call
> > > > > to error_messages in the view.
> >
> > > > > Is there a better workaround?
> >
> > > > > This is the stack trace, in case it helps (I just updated to the
> > > > > latest 0.10 release candidate for all dm gems).
> >
> > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > > > > C:/Ruby18/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/dm-validations-0.10.0/lib/dm-
> > > > > validations/validation_errors.rb:106:in `send'
> > > > > C:/Ruby18/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/dm-validations-0.10.0/lib/dm-
> > > > > validations/validation_errors.rb:106:in `method_missing'
> > > > > C:/Ruby18/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.2/lib/action_view/
> > > > > helpers/active_record_helper.rb:179:in `error_messages_for'
> > > > > C:/Ruby18/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.2/lib/action_view/
> > > > > renderable.rb:77:in `inject'
> > > > > C:/Ruby18/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.2/lib/action_view/
> > > > > helpers/active_record_helper.rb:179:in `each'
> > > > > C:/Ruby18/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.2/lib/action_view/
> > > > > helpers/active_record_helper.rb:179:in `inject'
> > > > > C:/Ruby18/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.2/lib/action_view/
> > > > > helpers/active_record_helper.rb:179:in `error_messages_for'
> > > > > C:/Ruby18/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.2/lib/action_view/
> > > > > helpers/form_helper.rb:984:in `error_messages'
> >
> > > > --
> > > > Yehuda Katz
> > > > Developer | Engine Yard
> > > > (ph) 718.877.1325
> >
> >
> >
>


-- 
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"DataMapper" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to