Hi Rupert, > Having looked through that it seems that the problem is that there is > no longer any :remote_name option for the has association so it's not > able to find the target in the join model.
I was waiting for someone to ask for that before adding it back in :) I'm not sure :remote_name is the best name for it though, so if I did add it back I'd probably support :remote_name, with a warning to use the new option instead. > So I guess the question is, is the :remote_name omission a bug which I > should file a ticket for If you could file a ticket for this I would appreciate it. Bonus points for a stand-along script demonstrating the problem -- it's much easier for me to know if I've resolved the problem when I can see it working by running a script. Dan (dkubb) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataMapper" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
