Martin, > I can confirm the behavior you get from your gist. I'm not yet sure > though if that is supposed to work anyway. Here's a probably more > idiomatic way to write your stuff:http://pastie.org/639450
I agree that this is more idiomatic approach to the problem. It shows a beautiful example of how "named scoped"-like behavior can be implemented using DataMapper, without any special DSLs and natural ruby code. -- Dan (dkubb) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataMapper" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
