We were also running into the same issue, and altho we were using the
filter_records method (which run the sort_records method). The test
that Sebastian metiond also failed. We just made a change that creates
the ids for the records in an incremental way, instead of randomly and
now all the tests pass all the time.

Manuel

On Aug 22, 8:43 pm, "Dan Kubb (dkubb)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sebastian
>
>
>
>
>
> > i am currently testing my ownadapterto conform to thesharedadapter
> > spec:
>
> >http://github.com/datamapper/dm-core/blob/master/lib/dm-core/spec/sha...
>
> > It currently fails with two tests, because myadapterdoes  return the
> > queried objects in
> > random order. Thus i would like to know if i really need to provide
> > the results in the order
> > as they have been initially created or if this is a "bug" of the
> >sharedadapterspec?
>
> > it 'should be able to search for object with a nil value using
> > required properties' do
> >    Heffalump.all(:id.not => nil).should == [ @red, @two, @five ]
> > end
> > it 'should be able to search for objects not in an empty list (match
> > all)' do
> >   Heffalump.all(:color.not => []).should == [ @red, @two, @five ]
> > end
>
> By default the Query object will have the order set to an Array
> equivalent to the properties defined in the model. This ensures that
> results are returned in a deterministic order between all adapters. If
> results varied between adapters, then client code would have to be
> aware of the different behaviour of eachadapter, which somewhat
> defeats the purpose of DM.
>
> There are helper methods inside the Query object that can sort the
> resources before returning them from theadapter. Look for the method
> Query#sort_records for more info.
>
> --
>
> Dan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"DataMapper" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en.

Reply via email to