Does the -m option of rails support file:// URIs? There has to be a way to get the Rails generator to accept a local template.
On 09/05/2010 12:15 PM, Ted Han wrote: > sure sure, but that would require them to have d/led the templates and > all that sort of stuff, and know how to host the files via sinatra. > Not a terrible problem, but not really... automatic. It'd be nice if > we did include sensible defaults in the gems and keep cutting edge > ones up on the site or something if people want to use them. > > how about that? > > -T > > On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Martin Gamsjaeger <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hey guys, > > One way to achieve local dm-rails app installs is to provide a simple > rack endpoint that serves the template files and serve that via rackup > or rails itself. Users can then point the rails new project -m command > to that URL and have their application template served locally. > Basically, that's what I've done in my old rails-templates repo [1]. > I've used sinatra over there, but rack alone would probably be enough, > rails itself would be just as easy tho. > > cheers > snusnu > > On Sep 5, 12:21 pm, Jonathan Stott <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On 5 September 2010 08:24, Ted Han <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > Hey gang (this is primarily a way to get a message to snusnu), > > > I am poking around w/ dm-rails and one thing that immediately > jumped out at > > > me was the invocation > that http://github.com/datamapper/dm-railsrecommends > > > is just ripe for a man in the middle attack. Additionally > invocation that > > > requires hitting the web means that you can't start new > projects when you > > > don't have a net connection. > > > wycats suggested that there should be a railties generator that we > > > distribute with the dm-rails gem (like the ones used in beard > for instance > > >http://github.com/carlhuda/beard/tree/master/lib/generators/). > And while > > > that doesn't fix the MitM attack vector (which did spawn an > interesting > > > conversation on twitter regarding rubygems' security model), > it will reduce > > > the opportunity for attack and also make it runnable locally. > > > So if ppl think that's the way to go (i do), or have > objections, please say > > > so! > > > -Ted > > > > I agree, having it as a gem, while it's potentially slower > moving for > > updates, seems like a more sensible idea, both from a security > PoV and > > also the convenience of being able to do things offline. > > > > Regards > > Jon > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "DataMapper" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > <mailto:datamapper%[email protected]>. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "DataMapper" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
