Hi,

I still get the error with your spec code, here is the backtrace.

Failures:

  1) Loan#count! when a loan exists from giver to receiver
     Failure/Error: Loan.count!(money_flow)
     DataMapper::ImmutableError:
       Immutable resource cannot be modified
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/dm-core-1.0.2/lib/dm-core/resource/state/immutable.rb:16:in
 `set'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/dm-core-1.0.2/lib/dm-core/model/property.rb:251:in
 `amount='
     # ./lib/models.rb:49:in `count!'
     # ./spec/models_spec.rb:64:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-expectations-2.4.0/lib/rspec/matchers/change.rb:17:in
 `call'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-expectations-2.4.0/lib/rspec/matchers/change.rb:17:in
 `matches?'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-expectations-2.4.0/lib/rspec/expectations/handler.rb:34:in
 `handle_matcher'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-expectations-2.4.0/lib/rspec/expectations/extensions/kernel.rb:50:in
 `should_not'
     # ./spec/models_spec.rb:63:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/example.rb:49:in
 `instance_eval'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/example.rb:49:in
 `block (2 levels) in run'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/example.rb:98:in
 `with_around_hooks'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/example.rb:46:in
 `block in run'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/example.rb:91:in
 `block in with_pending_capture'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/example.rb:90:in
 `catch'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/example.rb:90:in
 `with_pending_capture'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/example.rb:45:in
 `run'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:261:in
 `block in run_examples'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:257:in
 `map'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:257:in
 `run_examples'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:231:in
 `run'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:232:in
 `block in run'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:232:in
 `map'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:232:in
 `run'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/command_line.rb:27:in
 `block (2 levels) in run'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/command_line.rb:27:in
 `map'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/command_line.rb:27:in
 `block in run'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/reporter.rb:12:in
 `report'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/command_line.rb:24:in
 `run'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:55:in
 `run_in_process'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:46:in
 `run'
     # 
/Users/siegfried/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:10:in
 `block in autorun'


On Jan 11, 2011, at 7:05 AM, RipTheJacker wrote:

> You should probably just change that spec. The element that you want
> to test is a proc (you hope) getting invoked inside of the subject
> block, which is a weird pattern, and you don't need the #let blocks
> really, since you only use those objects once.
> 
> Try:
> 
> describe "#count!" do
>    specify "when a loan exists from giver to receiver" do
>        loan = Loan.gen
>        money_flow = MoneyFlow.gen(:giver => loan.loaner, :receiver =>
> loan.loanee, :currency => loan.currency)
>      expect do
>        Loan.count!(money_flow)
>      end.to_not change(Loan, :count)
>    end
>  end
> 
> 
> I'm assuming you are using rspec 2, though it will work in rspec 1.x
> with a syntax change. If you still get that error, post the new
> backtrace here. At the very least the spec and the backtrace will be
> more meaningful this way, and may be easier to debug (I hope).
> 
> On Jan 10, 10:42 am, Zhi-Qiang Lei <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I have some code as follow.
>> 
>> class Loan
>>   include DataMapper::Resource
>>   belongs_to :loaner, Person, :key => true
>>   belongs_to :loanee, Person, :key => true
>>   property :currency, Enum[*CURRENCY_CODES], :key => true
>>   property :amount, Decimal, :scale => 2, :default => 0
>> 
>>   def self.count!(money_flow)
>>     loan = get(money_flow.currency, money_flow.giver_id, 
>> money_flow.receiver_id)
>>     loan.amount += money_flow.amount
>>   end
>> 
>>   # more code...
>> end
>> 
>> class MoneyFlow
>>   include DataMapper::Resource
>>   belongs_to :giver, Person
>>   belongs_to :receiver, Person
>> 
>>   property :id, Serial
>>   property :amount, Decimal, :scale => 2, :min => 0.01
>>   property :currency, Enum[*CURRENCY_CODES], :default => :CNY
>> 
>>   # more code...
>> end
>> 
>> When I test the "count!" class method as follow:
>> 
>>   describe "#count!" do
>>     subject { lambda { Loan.count!(money_flow) } }
>>     context "when a loan exists from giver to receiver" do
>>       let!(:loan) { Loan.gen }
>>       let(:money_flow) { MoneyFlow.gen(:giver => loan.loaner, :receiver => 
>> loan.loanee, :currency => loan.currency) }
>>       it { should_not change(Loan, :count) }
>>     end
>>   end
>> 
>> It tells me I got a Immutable Error. I feel strange on that. They have keys, 
>> and I didn't destroy the record. Can you see why? Thanks.
>> 
>>   1) Loan#count! when a loan exists from giver to receiver
>>      Failure/Error: subject { lambda { Loan.count!(money_flow) } }
>>      DataMapper::ImmutableError:
>>        Immutable resource cannot be modified
>>      # ./lib/models.rb:49:in `count!'
>>      # ./spec/models_spec.rb:59:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'
>>      # ./spec/models_spec.rb:63:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'
>> 
>> On Jan 10, 2011, at 11:34 PM, Ted Han wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Objects are immutable when they've been deleted or frozen for some reason.  
>>> Deleting a record from your data store will always result in that record 
>>> being frozen.
>> 
>>> Is there a specific problem that you're having?
>> 
>>> -T
>> 
>>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Zhi-Qiang Lei <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>> Dear All,
>> 
>>> Could anyone answer me when a resource should be immutable? And why? Thanks.
>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Zhi-Qiang Lei
>>> [email protected]
>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "DataMapper" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group 
>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en.
>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "DataMapper" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group 
>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Zhi-Qiang Lei
>> [email protected]
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "DataMapper" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en.
> 


Best regards,
Zhi-Qiang Lei
[email protected]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"DataMapper" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en.

Reply via email to