On May 6, 2011, at 1:23 AM, Piotr Solnica wrote: > Can't say anything about dm-is-versioned or paper_trail as I've never > used them. I will tho use paper_trail soon so I could get back to you > with some feedback re its API.
I'd love to hear what you think about it. > It's hard to say at this point how exactly we're gonna approach that > from organization pov. Maybe gems will stay under datamapper account and > more people will get commit bit although I suspect it would be better to > move them to new maintainers accounts. I can imagine that the maintenance burden of keeping all those gems moving forward is a lot. Moving many of the gems to other maintainers' accounts makes good sense to me for a lot of the 'extras'. > So, if you want to improve or even completely rewrite dm-is-versioned - > just do it. There's no need to create dm-is-versioned-deluxe or > something :) Alright! I'm already worried that time constraints are going to push me into an inflexible, app-specific solution, but if I can pull something reasonable general out of it, I'll do so. Thanks for your blessings! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataMapper" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en.
