Yeah, I'll definitely paste it back once I'm done. It will be slightly different, but it's based on the same idea. I'm working on it as we speak ;)
El 06/05/2011, a las 22:13, Martin Gamsjaeger escribió: > Chris, > > Yeah #method_missing would probably catch the call to #execute, however, > changing the code shouldn't be too hard, as you said. > > Would you mind pasting back the master_slave adapter you end up with? I'd > love to add a section on datamapper.org that explains the setup. If you were > to issue a pull request for that repo, that'd be even more awesome of course > ;) > > cheers > snusnu > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 13:03, Chris Corbyn <[email protected]> wrote: > Wow, so simple, thanks! You have honestly saved me an entire night's digging > around, probably going down the wrong path. > > Actually, this helps me with something else I need to do too with a wrapper > around another object. > > Does this still work if I do something like: > > repository(:default).adapter.execute("INSERT INTO userlogins (user_id, > created_at) VALUES (?, ?)", ....) > > Or would that actually end up being sent to the slave due to the > method_missing() falling back to the slave? > > We actually have a pool of slaves, but that's easy to implement anyway. > > Thanks again, I had been searching for over a day for a solution, amazed that > there didn't seem to be a plugin. > > > > El 06/05/2011, a las 20:53, Martin Gamsjaeger escribió: > >> Chris, >> >> Does this help? https://gist.github.com/280645 >> >> cheers >> snusnu >> >> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 02:18, Chris Corbyn <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Guys, >> >> We use MySQL replication in production and need to be able to send writes to >> a known database (currently just one, but potentially it could become a >> pool) and reads from any of the available databases. If writes are done to >> any of the slaves, bad things will happen. >> >> This isn't magic, so I'd be amazed if nobody has already tackled this. >> Please let me know if anyone knows of a gem for it, or if this is already >> supported via configuration options. >> >> There's a project called Octopus, but it's not ORM agnostic and assumes >> you're using ActiveRecord. I can't find anything for DataMapper via Google. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Chris >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "DataMapper" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en. >> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "DataMapper" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "DataMapper" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "DataMapper" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataMapper" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en.
