Nisha, no problems messing up my name - I'm already used to that with my other one (Narasimhan) :) By 15 Mar, the survey would be complete and the data will all be in, so yes, we could play with it at the ODC. We can talk once you've had a chance to review the questionnaire.
Kishore. ----------------------- www.dakshindia.org On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Nisha Thompson <nisha.thomp...@gmail.com>wrote: > Sorry! Kishore! > > I was saying it out loud and spelled it wrong. > > Nisha > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Nisha Thompson > <nisha.thomp...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hey Keyshore! >> >> This is a great dataset! I would like to brainstorm with you on it so we >> can see what can be done with it. >> >> Yes we are definitely doing an election themed Open Data Camp around >> March 15th 16th, which would be a great venue for getting more ideas and >> also having some space so people can work with the data and play with it. >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Srinivasan Ramani < >> srinivasan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Some thoughts - >>> >>> >>> * The survey of 2.5 lakh would certainly be exhaustive but I personally >>> feel it could be over-done. Sampling can be somewhat lesser than that to >>> yield more focussed results (for easier post-survey processing, I suppose). >>> >>> * But that said, the survey could seek to not to fully replicate efforts >>> such as what the CSDS' Lokniti already does. One weakness I believe that >>> the Lokniti surveys have is that while the questionnaires gauge background >>> and attitude towards politics variables quite well, they don't necessarily >>> capture reasons and expectations that much well. >>> >>> So, for e.g.,if the questionnaire and data can be more than just "what >>> are the reasons you vote for a candidate" .. maybe, "why do you think your >>> choice of party/candidate is better than the alternative".. "what schemes >>> have you benefitted from during MP's tenure / or hope to benefit from".. >>> Also, opinions such as "who do you think could be an ideal leader?" to >>> reflect opinions on the kind of representatives they would like to have ... >>> is another thing that would be helpful. >>> >>> * Beyond political opinion, better knowledge of class backgrounds will >>> also be useful (in terms of profession, homes, access to facilities etc). >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Kishore (Narasimhan) Mandyam < >>> kish...@dakshindia.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Daksh is currently conducting a Nationwide in-field survey about >>>> people's perceptions about their MPs. We're talking to nearly 2.5 lakh >>>> (that's 250,000!) people in nearly 10,000 locations, in over 500 MP >>>> constituencies. The math works out to about 500 responses in each >>>> Constituency - stratified and randomized enough to give an analyst a fairly >>>> clear picture of what people are thinking. The data consists of 10 >>>> demographic details (gender, rural/urban resident, religion, occupation, >>>> qualification, roof-type, assets owned, etc.), four "political awareness" >>>> points ("Did you vote..?", "What are the reasons you vote for a candidate?" >>>> and so on) and upto 30 issue-based Performance questions (bijli / sadak / >>>> paani kinds of things). Respondents tell us how important they think a >>>> specific issue is (Low / Medium / High) AND how well they think their MP >>>> has done in that specific issue. We've done thins kind of thing for >>>> Karnataka MLAs before and one of the more populist results was a series of >>>> MLA Scorecards that appeared pre-election in Vijay Karnataka, Indian >>>> Express and Times of India in 2013. With this much-wider survey, though, >>>> we're wondering about the various other things we could do - from mapping >>>> people's perceptions about caste and criminality to inferring rural and >>>> urban unemployment rates. But that's probably the low-hanging fruit. How >>>> else could this data be used? Ideas welcome! >>>> >>>> -- >>>> For more details about this list >>>> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "datameet" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> For more details about this list >>> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "datameet" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Nisha Thompson >> Mobile: 962-061-2245 >> >> > > > -- > Nisha Thompson > Mobile: 962-061-2245 > > -- > For more details about this list > http://datameet.org/discussions/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "datameet" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/datameet/axFGNa5cQtA/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- For more details about this list http://datameet.org/discussions/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.