Hi, I have updated the villages file. There was a mistake and it also contained district polygons. Here is the link to the parent folder https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0Bw9Ef2_V5qDeOTFwV1U1WDA5Rnc&usp=sharing
On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 12:13:42 PM UTC+5:30, Dilip Damle wrote: > > HI, > > I have uploaded the shape files. > > THIS IS WORK IN PROGRESS FOR THE INFORMATION OF ALL. NOT TO USE FOR ANY > OTHER PURPOSE. > > There are 5 shape files as below > 1. Districts : District boundary polygons. Since the data is imported > district wise. There is *slive*r level mismatching at the district > boundaries. > 2. Taluka : Boundary polygons > 3. Villages : Boundary polygons > 4. Dotmark : All text seen as a dot mark. This is the location of the > Populated Place. Actually it is ! mark with an ESRI symbol font > 5. Text : all other text, This includes all names and other markers other > than the text ! > > There are attributesattached as follows > Ehandle : Entity handle from the Autocad drawing, this makes it unique > across all shape files and easily traceble back to the drawing if required. > LAYER : this is the district name to which the feature belongs > There are other attributes which are self explanatory > Her is the link > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bw9Ef2_V5qDeNXQ3clY4MXhXcFE/view?usp=sharing > > > On Thursday, January 21, 2016 at 10:55:35 PM UTC+5:30, Dilip Damle wrote: >> >> HI Justin, >> I can do not. Give me about a day or two. >> Will check for cleanliness before doing it. >> >> >> On Thursday, January 21, 2016 at 9:35:26 PM UTC+5:30, Justin Meyers wrote: >>> >>> Dilip, >>> can you convert this into shapefile? add a unique id to each poly. i >>> will try to get names for all the polygons. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Justin >>> >>> On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 at 2:35:30 PM UTC-5, Dilip Damle wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> As mentioned in the Map digitisation effort thread I have uploaded a >>>> DWG file with the boundaries extracted form the links in the "Map >>>> Digitisation efforts" post. >>>> >>>> This is a WORK IN PROGRESS not a final data. >>>> Basic information >>>> File DWG, Version 2013, >>>> Created in Autocad Map 2015 >>>> Projection UTM-43N >>>> Georeferencing YES : I have tried to georeference it using the Data >>>> Datameet 2011-DIST data as reference. In the process I have not applied >>>> any >>>> shape changing transformations on the data from the original source. (used >>>> only move, scale and rotate This will make it easier for someone else to >>>> reference it in a better way if needed. >>>> Attribute links : NO >>>> Name of Villages and Talukas are there as TEXT >>>> All polylines are closed. >>>> >>>> I will include a detailed readme later. >>>> Down load link : >>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bw9Ef2_V5qDeanpjOUFNMnNiT1k/view?usp=sharing >>>> >>>> Enclosed in this post Two snapshot images and a pdf file to see the >>>> matching with the datameet 2011-Dist map. >>>> Feel free to discucss / use. Copyright : Work in progress : Use for >>>> improving the data only. >>>> >>>> I intend to work on this data to attach the village names to the >>>> polylines and then convert to a shape file. ( if someone else does it it >>>> is >>>> fine) >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Dilip Damle (Delhi) >>>> >>>> -- Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more about us by visiting http://datameet.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
