Great thanks. I later found it on another post.
Would it be possible to upload this on the Github here or the Datameet maps portal with the disclaimer that they are not 100% accurate, so that people could use it at their own risk? On Sunday, 6 January 2019 20:22:14 UTC+5:30, Naraina Damle wrote: > > Hi Dhaval, > > Actually I keep doing things in an Intermittent manner. > Then I move to something else. > > However I keep all my data safe. > > Here is the link to the Datameet folder on My Google Drive. > > There could be other things at other places. But Gujarat Data is here. > > > https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0Bw9Ef2_V5qDeOTFwV1U1WDA5Rnc?usp=sharing > > > > > > > On Friday, January 4, 2019 at 6:35:59 PM UTC+5:30, Dhaval Shukla wrote: >> >> Hey >> >> Naraina had done something with Gujarat district and village shape files >> some time ago, but for the life of me I am not able to find it on this >> group today. I downloaded it at the time about a week ago. >> >> This village and district data hasn't been uploaded to the datameet >> github nor yours. >> >> Naraina, I wanted to know if there is a reason why. It is most accurate I >> have found of Gujarat till date (although there are some errors). >> >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 20:04:16 UTC+5:30, Justin wrote: >>> >>> I plan on trying to update individual states to 2018 standards/ amounts/ >>> etc. I know this is a crazy idea, but I am going to start. >>> >>> I have started with Goa, it has been a challenge. I thought I was going >>> to finish over two weeks ago, but just haven't had time and have been doing >>> more tracing of villages that what I thought I was going to have to do. >>> >>> I am trying to align amounts with http://lgdirectory.gov.in/ and >>> http://nlrmp.nic.in/faces/masterReport/masterReport.xhtml >>> >>> Sometimes these may disagree and may be missing towns, but I am trying >>> to make sure I account for those somehow. Once I finish, I will upload >>> hoping for feedback as per what I did wrong, am missing, or anything else. >>> >>> I think a state-by-state way is the only way to successfully do this. >>> Trying to do all 6-8 lakh would be a nightmare, so breaking it down to >>> several hundred - a few thousand would be easiest and manageable. >>> >>> Please let me know if you would like to help, start mapping a state, or >>> give any feedback, ideas, data, solutions, etc. >>> >>> Thank you all so much! >>> >>> Justin >>> >> -- Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more about us by visiting http://datameet.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
