A million voters is a lot of voters...   I too end up using many indexes with 
DP...  the impost is not so great as it is with Access...   


----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Don Friedman 
  To: Dataperfect Users Discussion Group 
  Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 9:56 AM
  Subject: Re: [Dataperf] Importing STE w/o re-generating indexes


  Brian - my larger applications are fairly matured so my efficiency in 
indexing has probably gotten as good as it is going to get. The beauty of DP is 
that I can use indexes in so many ways that it makes sorting through a million 
voters for who I want to target awfully easy, and fast.

  Hope all is well with you.


  Don


  On Feb 17, 2008 4:14 PM, Brian Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

    Hi Robert,

    I agree with Don, 300Mb of data and indexes is a relatively small database, 
 and on a standalone machine reindexing might only take a very short space of 
time...  Over a slow network might be a littloe too much, but if it is on a 
network server, it night be easier to copy it off, reindex and text the renamed 
database and then upload it to the server.

    Hi Don,

    290Mb Index is a big index !!!    Whenever I find myself with big indexes I 
use the Dpdiag utility to check if anything is redundant. Not only do large 
indexes consume time with reindexing, but they also consume time when writing 
data, and so removing unused indexes improves performance. (by default 
Microsoft Access Indexes every fieldname with the letters "id" or "no" in it, 
and often at the end of a development cycle I find that a relatively large 
percentage of my database are these useless indexes, and trimming them our 
demonstrably improves data save times.)

    Regards
    Brian



      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Don Friedman 
      To: Dataperfect Users Discussion Group 
      Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 3:06 AM
      Subject: Re: [Dataperf] Importing STE w/o re-generating indexes


      Robert - glad all is well with you. 

      A big clean might be a good thing to do right after you change the names. 
It dusts off the cobwebs and with today's machines hardly takes much time. I 
also have large databases - one county's index is 290Meg - but if I start 
regenerating before I leave the office in the early evening it is done when I 
come back in the morning. Not a problem.


      Don Friedman
      Pittsburgh


      On Feb 16, 2008 4:21 PM, Robert Pollard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

        Dear Friends,

        I are renaming a database, so will be using WP 5.1+  search and replace 
in the .STE file, but will not otherwise be making any changes.

        I seem to remember there is a startup option to tell DP not to recreate 
all the indexes and running DPIMP. Since the databases has 99 panels, and about 
300 megabytes in total data & index files, with a good number of panels having 
10 or more indexes, si I am not enthisiastic about waiting for the whole 
database to be reindexed

        Btw, although I have not been active on this list I am continuing to 
grow my database work, with much of it generated content for TiddlyWiki sites I 
have developed.  See www.ngo-framework.net for the most recent site, that has 
now become the interim official web site for a major UN/NGO conference in 
September in Paris, preparing for the 60th Anniversary of the Universal 
Declaration of Human Rights, and with the tentative theme: Dignity, Integrity & 
Justice for All of Us: Being the change we want to see.

        In conjunction my role as Co-Chair of the Research, Communications & 
Website Sub-Committee for the Conference Planning Committee, I am renaming my 
database UDHR60 and will be dedicating its use as the digital engine for the 
conference  preparations, participation & follow-up.

        Please don't be surprised if I am around asking some questions - 
including exploring ways to better integrate the genius of DP with that of 
TiddlyWiki

        With warm regard

        Robert


        _______________________________________________
        Dataperf mailing list
        [email protected]
        http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf





      -- 
      Don Friedman
      ProfessionalRecords.Com LLC
      PRS Data Systems
      205 S Main Street
      Pittsburgh, PA   15215
      412-784-1600 - 1-800-PRS-FILE 
      412-784-1615 Fax 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------


      _______________________________________________
      Dataperf mailing list
      [email protected]
      http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf


    _______________________________________________
    Dataperf mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf





  -- 
  Don Friedman
  ProfessionalRecords.Com LLC
  PRS Data Systems
  205 S Main Street
  Pittsburgh, PA   15215
  412-784-1600 - 1-800-PRS-FILE 
  412-784-1615 Fax 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Dataperf mailing list
  [email protected]
  http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf
_______________________________________________
Dataperf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf

Reply via email to