All,

The DP2.6Y is now available for download from the site
http://www.dataperfect.nl and trough this direct link
http://www.dataperfect.nl/files/dp26y.zip.
Lew's comments are packed in the ZIPped file as readme.txt.

Regards,
Udo Tjalsma



2008/6/14 Ralph Alvy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> I have just sent Udo the latest official versions of DP, for posting on the
> DP Users Web site. Here are Lew's comments about it, which he wants
> distributed with those versions:
>
> --- Lew's message follows here ---
>
> Here is a new zip file that includes two versions of DataPerfect that only
> differ by a single byte. The versions of DP2.6Y are DP26YI.EXE and
> DP26YU.EXE, and the only difference is in the web text output for a text
> field having a format suffix of ;;W – the first version surrounds underlined
> text with <i> ... </i> and the second with <u> ... </u>. Those used to HTML
> will note that these are the codes for italics and underline. Perhaps I
> should add italics support to DP in addition to that for bold and underline,
> but as an old DOS application, DataPerfect is already far beyond it's
> initial goals, and adding italics would severely stress it. I think I'd
> rather try to make progress on a Windows version.
>
> [There is a bug remaining that I wanted to fix before sending this out, but
> I need your help if I am to fix it. When report output is sent to a file in
> WordPerfect format, it includes a header that sets the margins. Evidently
> this is not always wanted, or else it is not done correctly, or something. I
> would like to fix it, but I don't know what is wanted. And we need to be
> careful no to break DPSpool. Help!]
>
> The main purpose for DP2.6Y is to better support scripting, so it will be
> more useful in web based applications and desktop application which are
> driven by scripts. Scripting programs usually form a chain communicating
> with STDOUT / STDIN -- "standard" output and input, so now DataPerfect will
> write the output from reports to STDOUT when the report is executed within a
> transaction log processed using the /EI command line option. If you are not
> using this in a scripting application, you will simply see this output to
> STDOUT as "printing" or "typing" to the console / display. This is quite
> different from the "normal" output from a DP report. Also, a b ug was fixed
> so that multiple reports can be run from a transaction log.
>
> [The following from Brian Hancock.] "For example if you run the DOS DIR
> command at a DOS screen the output streams onto the console screen, and
> after DIR has finished you can still read the output on the console. In
> contrast a DP report printing to the screen only displays while DP is
> executing, and is removed from the screen after you exit the report and
> before DP exits. There are a couple of advantages to being able to output to
> STDOUT (or the console). Firstly at present to use output from DP in another
> program you first have to save it to a file in DP, and then open the file
> with another program to use the data. It is currently not possible to pipe
> data from one application into another. Many DOS users would be used to
> piping the output from DIR to the MORE command so you can view the output a
> page at a time. There are many advanced text processing tools which could be
> used with DP more quickly and efficiently, such as AWK and SED, etc. The new
> version allows piping to secondary processes.
> A major advantage of using STDOUT for output from DP is that data can be
> sent directly to a web browser or other Internet application. At present you
> need to save the output from DP into a file, and then with another program
> read the file and output it to the web browser. This has two problems,
> firstly, there are more steps to getting data to the browser and so is
> slower, and secondly, until a report finishes and DP exits nothing can be
> sent to the browser, so there is often a long period of inactivty until the
> web browser's screen suddenly fills with data. (users often think a problem
> has occurred with this delay). Using STDOUT, output from DP reaches the web
> browser screen as it is output from DP, so even a long slow DP report can
> present results to the user while it is still running."
>
> [More later about difficulties experienced by Brian.]
> There are many bug fixes, and other changes include:
> the ;;W field output formatter will act on An as well as AmAn fields
>
> ;;W acts on all of the XML/XHTML predefined entities, & &amp; " &quot; '
> &apos; < &lt; > &gt;
>
> the ;;W transforms a single line break (carriage return) in a AxAy memo
> type field to a <br /> instead of <BR> to conform more with XML and XHTML
> standards.
>
> the ;;W transforms two consecutive line breaks in an AxAy memo field to two
> line breaks <br /><br / instead of a single <p>. This also makes it more
> conforming to XML and XHTML standards.
>
> the ;;W transforms bold markup in an AxAy field to <b>...</b> in place of
> <B>...</B> to make it conform to standards.
>
> The Beep function is removed – and this leads us to the second area of
> concern when trying to use DP as a scripting engine.
>
> DataPerfect uses "spin" coding while waiting for keyboard input. It does
> this so that, in a network environment, it can remain "alive" and show
> changes made by others. However, this uses the CPU completely and doesn't
> share CPU cycles like normal Windows programs. This, or perhaps the file
> locking primitives, causes the following problem experienced by Brian:
>
> "I have tried to get DP 2.6Y working on a Windows IIS webserver, but still
> no luck. I was hoping that with the removal of BEEP functions, and
> eliminating support for Hercules cards that it might not have polled
> hardware as much, which was a stab in the dark I was having about why it was
> not working.
> The error message from Windows is "The system cannot execute the specified
> program."
> I can execute other DOS internal commands and even other external DOS
> applications/commands successfully.
> If the Windows webserver is running Apache rather than IIS, then it works.
> The error message "The system cannot execute the specified program." is
> generally used when an application can't find depende ncies, such as missing
> DLL's etc. It can also be permission issues. Since I can run other DOS
> applications in the same folder, I know I have general permissions to do
> this, which now has me wondering about things like the DP.SYS file. If it
> was just that DP.EXE could not find DP.SYS I would get other errors from
> DP.EXE such as "Can't find DP.SYS", and since the message "The system cannot
> execute the specified program." is not contained withing the DP.EXE or
> DP.SYS it really does have to be coming from the operating system or IIS
> itself.
> This leads me a few questions. What is in DP.SYS? Does DP.EXE dynamically
> load DP.SYS only when needed, or does it always load it, and does it unload
> DP.SYS for other memory intensive operations. Why does DP.SYS need to be
> separately loaded?
> I know these are stabs in the dark about DP.SYS. Do you think there might
> be other mechanisms at play. For instance I know DP has some form of phone
> dialer, does it prove hardware for the presence of COM ports, or even
> printer ports?
> The really nice thing about getting DP to run on Windows with IIS is that
> it can natively run DOS applications, and so unlike Linux/Unix/BSD, you are
> not dependent firstly on loading an emulator like DOSEMU, but for commercial
> hosting, the hardest thing is to find is someone who will actually install
> it on their server. I have searched the world for commercial webhosters that
> run Windows with Apache as that would solve many things, but alas they are a
> very very rare breed, if they do at exist - I think I might find a Yeti
> first. "
>
> I don't know what is causing Brian's problem. Do any of you? Is it the file
> locking? I don't think it is DP.SYS, which is simply a file of text
> fragments that is sort of an analog to the "help" file for a Windows
> program.
>
> Perhaps I should make a special version of DP without the "spin" code. Such
> a version would only check for modifications on the network when a keystroke
> is pressed.  It would u se DOS keystroke input and would not execute quite
> the same.
>
> Anyway, DP2.6Y cures a lot of problems and hopefully will be very useful.
>
> And now, back to work!
>
> Lew Bastian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dataperf mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf
>



-- 
Met vriendelijke groet,
DynamiXS Ltd
Udo Tjalsma

DynamiXS Internet en DynamiXS Telecom zijn handelsnamen van
DynamiXS Ltd

A Postbus 87, 4130 EB Vianen (Ut)
B Klaverkamp 21, 4133 TD Vianen (Ut)
T +31 (0)88 DYNAMIX (+31 (0)88 3962649)
F +31 (0)88 3962699
U http://www.dynamixs.eu
E [EMAIL PROTECTED]

*************************************************************
N.B.: op (de inhoud van) deze e-mail is een DISCLAIMER
met belangrijke VOORBEHOUDEN van toepassing:
zie http://www.dynamixs.com/index.php?id=disclaimer

This e-mail and its contents are subject to a DISCLAIMER
with important RESERVATIONS:
see http://www.dynamixs.com/index.php?id=disclaimer
*************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Dataperf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf

Reply via email to