Hi Brian,
Thanks for your usual well thought through reasoning on this one: in experimenting I found that if I tried using a text field with a conditional apply.format formula, the time field does not discriminate between no entry and 00:00 so a text field made to act like a time field seems the way to go - I will experiment further!

Regards
Michael


Brian Hancock wrote:

But I do not think the Print mode indicators work for display on Panel Fields, otherwise you just use the Print Mode indicator THMS99:99;;E, which works fine in Reports

I have to say I have not weighed in on this discussion like I usually do J because I was worried that there was not going to be a clearcut solution. Time fields are a special number format, and the empty field is a zero (DP doesn't really have the concept of a Null data type), and 00:00 really is a valid time, so what if something really did happen at 00:00

I think if I was forced to do this, and depending on how the data gets into this field, if it were a human data entry field, I would rethink the time field, and change it to a Text field. I would use a formula on this text field that acts on itself, to format it the way you want. So an empty string would be different to the "00:00" string. You would need a validating formula, which would need subfields, and test to see that the first subfield (hour) was in the range 0 to 23, and the 2^nd subfield (minute) was between, or see if you can force it to use the Apply.format with a T99:99;;E to give you blanks when it was 00:00. But doing it this way means a blank field would truly be a time entry that had not been entered. This however means that to use this for time calculations you variously have to be using the Convert[] and Apply.format, and if you wanted to

If the data in the time field was added by result of a formula to capture the current time and date, and if 00:00 was an unlikely date, I would make this real field hidden T99:99::H and have an non updateable Text field A6::N to display it. In terms of screen real estate, I think you can get away with the Time field only being T9::H so it only takes up 1 char on screen space, because I think the T format preallocates space, the digits are just there for the eye candy of the visual display. But if you do the T9 trick (or in fact if you do a similar trick on D fields) if you use the Built-In Special Report to export data when say you are modifying the application, you get into a bind because the time field is truncated, and lost during the Export, and hence not available for subsequent Import. (Painful experience talking here)

Regards

Brian

------------------------------------------------------------------------

*From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Patrick Riley
*Sent:* Tuesday, 20 October 2009 2:16 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [Dataperf] Time field query (more)

Michael, I'm pretty sure ;;H is not a valid print suffix.  The print
suffix ;;E will print your empty field as a blank but will print 7:00
as 7: (no zeros to the right of the colon).

This is guaranteed to work.  Create a report variable (RV) based
on the below formula and then print the RV formatted as A5. Your
empty time field will print as blank while all other times will print as
you format in the formula.

Here's the formula (P1F2 is your time field):

  if P1F2 = 0 then "" else apply.format["T99:99";P1F2] endif

Here's some sample output:

        Field     Output
  ----------------------
  1     12:57     12:57
  2     03:45     03:45
  3     00:00
  4     06:06     06:06
  5     07:00     07:00
  6     00:07     00:07

I hope this helps.

Pat Riley
505-797-9072


At 05:20 PM 10/19/2009, you wrote:

You might use the ::H suffix to hide the field.

Sent from my iPhone
Don Friedman
ProfessionalRecords.Com <http://ProfessionalRecords.Com> LCC
413-784-1600
412-784-1615 FAX

On Oct 19, 2009, at 4:34 PM, Michael Iannantuoni <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


Don, Thanks for the suggestion but although the text field would display the way I wanted, wouldn't the original time field still display?

Michael


Don Friedman wrote:

Michael - offhand I'd say that the most obvious way is to use a computed text field programmed to duplicate the time field unless it reads 00:00 in which case it is empty or reads N/A or something like that.

Good luck.
Don Friedman
Pittsburgh

On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Michael Iannantuoni <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

I have a database which includes a Time filed formatted as T99:99 so

that 24 hour clock times display correctly with leading and trailing

zeros eg 09:30, however some records do not have time data so the field

displays 00:00. This can be misleading; is there a way to display time

fields so that entered data displays, even 00:00, but if nothing is

entered then the field does not display or displays as blanks?

Michael

_______________________________________________

Dataperf mailing list

[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf




--
Don Friedman
ProfessionalRecords.Com <http://ProfessionalRecords.Com> LLC
PRS Data Systems
205 S Main Street
Pittsburgh, PA   15215
412-784-1600 - 1-800-PRS-FILE
412-784-1615 Fax

_______________________________________________
Dataperf mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf
_______________________________________________
Dataperf mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf

_______________________________________________
Dataperf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf

------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Dataperf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf
_______________________________________________
Dataperf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf

Reply via email to