Brian,

I find that postings show up much more quickly on gmane than they appear in my 
email.

It seems like the turnaround time used to be faster. Perhaps Udo can comment on 
why the significant delay occurs now.

Tim Rude
  "Brian Hancock" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
news:63d48c94e08e4b438150861ede441...@brian4...
  Hi everyone,

   

  It always seems to take a long time from the time I send a posting to the 
time it gets emailed back to me so I went looking for a reason..I noticed from 
the headers of recent postings from various members that it takes approximately 
2hrs 5mins from the time of the email is queued to the SMTP server by the 
mailinglist to the time it is received. 

   

  Is this delay experienced for other members? 

   

  I find it a little annoying, because the lack of immediacy means that often 
the problem is resolved by someone else but their solution is floating around 
somewhere in cyberspace, and also if it is happening to everyone then someone 
is sitting there waiting for hours for their problem to be posted and a 
possible solution to arrive.

   

  You can see from the following header fragment where the delay occurs:

   

  Received: (qmail 28351 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2010 01:11:49 +0200

  Received: from localhost (HELO ns1.dynamixs.nl) (127.0.0.1)

    by localhost with SMTP; 12 Oct 2010 01:11:49 +0200

  Delivered-To: [email protected]

  Received: (qmail 18193 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2010 23:08:43 +0200

   

  This seems to have been a problem only in this last year or so, it was 
quicker some time ago, a representative corresponding header fragment is:

   

  Received: (qmail 21728 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2009 10:29:26 +0200

  Received: from localhost (HELO ns1.dynamixs.nl) (127.0.0.1)

    by localhost with SMTP; 17 Jun 2009 10:29:26 +0200

  Delivered-To: [email protected]

  Received: (qmail 20315 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2009 10:29:01 +0200

   

  where it seems to have about a 25 second turn around, although around that 
time it was not as consistent.

   

  I can understand it being a little variable depending on server loading, but 
now it seems so consistent in the delay that I wonder if there is some other 
issue happening here.

   

  Regards

  Brian

   

   



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Dataperf mailing list
  [email protected]
  http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf
_______________________________________________
Dataperf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf

Reply via email to