Don, 
 
Can you specify: 
a).  How the data is constructed?  With "Field","Field" or are some fields 
without quotes etc.? Importantly, are spaces being trimmed?
b).  Options used to import (Dos Import) etc.
c).  How you answered the two questiond DP asks when you import?    My memory 
is that the import will fail if you use the numbers.
 
Was the CSV generated wtih excel?  Excel varies a bit in generation and 
importation of CSV lists.


 


Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 23:23:27 -0500
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Dataperf] Problem with incrementing number

Hi Colin - and thanks again for the help with that other matter, they're making 
progress with it - the index on the panel was the ::I field, there was nothing 
imported into that field on the original import, it created it's own number. 
When I created an incrementing number separately on the spread sheet and 
removed the ::I from that field the import worked fine. That's what is making 
me think that the ::I can't keep up with the speed of the import.





2011/3/3 Colin Roberts <[email protected]>



Your Incremental field would need to be in the index used to import wasn't it?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Don Friedman 
To: Dataperfect Users Discussion Group 

Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 8:53 AM
Subject: [Dataperf] Problem with incrementing number




I was working with a small database today (a county with only about 91,000 
voters) and at a certain point I attempted to create a new panel and import a 
.csv file with about 17,000 lines of data using an incrementing GZZZZZ field as 
an index. Every attempt to import the data failed before completion so I tried 
creating the panel again, exporting and importing the .ste file and re-creating 
indexes. No luck.  


Inspected raw data. Looked fine.


Created a stand-alone database with a single panel for this application. Again, 
import kept failing.


Failing to come up with a credible reason why it wasn't working I added an 
index number to the data set so that rather than depending on the incrementing 
number, the data would have its own unique number. That did the trick.


Any ideas as to why?


Don Friedman

-- 
Don Friedman
ProfessionalRecords.Com LLC
PRS Data Systems
205 S Main Street
Pittsburgh, PA   15215
412-784-1600 - 1-800-PRS-FILE 
412-784-1615 Fax





_______________________________________________
Dataperf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf


_______________________________________________
Dataperf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf



-- 
Don Friedman
ProfessionalRecords.Com LLC
PRS Data Systems
205 S Main Street
Pittsburgh, PA   15215
412-784-1600 - 1-800-PRS-FILE 
412-784-1615 Fax

_______________________________________________ Dataperf mailing list 
[email protected] http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf   
                                    
_______________________________________________
Dataperf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf

Reply via email to