I'm guessing it will do well with it. CPU's of that ilk were pretty much DP's original target audience. :)
Tim Rude On 7/12/2018 3:39 PM, Dave Britten wrote: > Good to know. So far I haven't seen any problems testing with DOSBox set to > 5000 cycles. How a 16 MHz 186 handles it remains to be seen. ;) Thanks Ralph. > > -Dave Britten > >> On Jul 12, 2018, at 3:39 PM, Ralph Alvy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I never experienced a limit doing KATs that way. I never had cascading KATs. >> >>> On 12 Jul 2018, at 7:33, Dave Britten wrote: >>> >>> I've been working on a basic consulting time/billing database (I've been >>> busy lately; spreadsheets aren't cutting it anymore), and my time entry >>> panel is up to a whopping 24 keep-a-total definitions spread across 4 >>> auto-calculated fields and going through 6 different links. This is to >>> support various hour totals for clients, projects, monthly summaries, and a >>> few combinations of those. >>> >>> I don't have any cascading keep-a-totals going on yet; these are all >>> one-hop direct updates. Am I likely to encounter any problems with this >>> many? Aside from performance impact, that is - I have yet to see how my 16 >>> MHz HP palmtop handles it! >>> >>> -Dave Britten >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Dataperf mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.dataperfect.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dataperf >> _______________________________________________ >> Dataperf mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.dataperfect.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dataperf > _______________________________________________ > Dataperf mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.dataperfect.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dataperf _______________________________________________ Dataperf mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dataperfect.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dataperf
