I think you're missing the point Michael. Just because it's possible to do it the way it's done now, doesn't mean that's the best way, as I've tried to argue in the OP. I don't think you've addressed the issue of unnecessary complexity pointed out in OP.
-- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/changing-data-table-by-without-by-syntax-to-require-a-by-tp4664770p4664990.html Sent from the datatable-help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ datatable-help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/datatable-help
