la. den 04. 05. 2013 klokka 07.40 (-0400) skreiv Gabor Grothendieck: > I am not sure but I think that could be handled as a separate issue if > it becomes important. By using all.i= it makes it sufficiently > different from all.y= that users won't expect the same default and > further they will not necessarily expect that there be an all argument > for the left participant in the merge.
But won’t ‘all’ (e.g., ’all=TRUE’) automatically match ‘all.i’, while at the same time not give the same result as ‘all’ in ‘merge’? That could be confusing. -- Karl Ove Hufthammer _______________________________________________ datatable-help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/datatable-help
