Do you think it might be better to submit the speed FR to zoo instead?
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 5:14 AM, stat quant <[email protected]> wrote: > Speed is not too good and even behaviour is strange. > I really think this is anyway a very usefull feature and that data.table > should implement it (so you would not need zoo) > na.locf might do fancy stuff you don't need > > I implemented mine with Rcpp, truly it is just a for loop and that's it... > > > 2013/10/9 Eduard Antonyan <[email protected]> > >> What's unsatisfactory about the zoo function? Speed or smth else? >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:54 PM, statquant3 <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Yes you can do it with a window join but that's clearly overshoot... >>> Just a very simple function would do >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/What-about-this-FR-tp4677877p4677908.html >>> >>> Sent from the datatable-help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> datatable-help mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> >>> https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/datatable-help >>> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ datatable-help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/datatable-help
